Tech Blog

Arc Resistance of Melamine Molding Compounds

Melamine molding compounds are essential insulating materials for the electrical and instrumentation industries, widely used in mine electrical components, AC contactors, arc-extinguishing covers, and switch housings. Their arc resistance—the ability to resist surface carbonization and conductive bridge formation under high-voltage AC—is a critical performance indicator.

This article details the influencing factors, optimization strategies, and underlying mechanisms for electrical material researchers and manufacturers.

Importance of Arc Resistance of Melamine Molding Compounds

In high-voltage electrical equipment, MF molding compounds must withstand surface arc discharge without forming conductive carbon bridges, which could cause short circuits and equipment failure. Excellent arc resistance, combined with the material’s inherent advantages (low cost, good mechanical strength, and electrical insulation), makes it irreplaceable in the electrical industry.

Poor arc resistance is usually caused by three factors: an imperfect resin crosslinking structure, excessive organic components in the formulation, and high volatile content, which can lead to internal voids. Targeted optimization of these factors is the key to improving performance.

Resin Synthesis: The Foundation of Arc Resistance

The chemical structure of MF resin directly determines the arc resistance of the final molding compound. The core control parameter is the melamine-to-formaldehyde molar ratio (),, and the reaction process must be strictly regulated.

Optimal Molar Ratio Control

Molar Ratio Range: The ideal () varies slightly with melamine origin. For Japanese melamine, a 1:1.5 ratio is recommended; for domestic melamine, adjust accordingly based on raw material properties.
Impact Mechanism: Excessive formaldehyde reduces the nitrogen content of the resin, weakening its arc resistance. Insufficient formaldehyde leads to incomplete crosslinking, lowering mechanical strength and thermal stability.
Key Tip: For melamine from different regions, adjust the molar ratio to balance crosslinking density and nitrogen content.

Reaction Process Regulation

Alkaline Environment Control: Adjust the pH to alkaline with sodium hydroxide before the reaction. During the boiling condensation stage, add sodium hydroxide as needed when the pH drops significantly.
Promote Methylene Bond Formation: Slowing the condensation reaction rate helps form more stable methylene bonds (-CH_2-) instead of unstable ether bonds. A higher methylene bond content enhances both arc resistance and mechanical properties.
Avoid Side Reactions: Prevent excessive Cannizzaro reactions of formaldehyde, which produce formic acid and accelerate resin degradation, reducing arc resistance.

Formula Optimization: Fillers Determine Arc Resistance Performance

The filler system is the most direct factor affecting the arc resistance of melamine molding compounds. The core strategy is to reduce organic fillers and increase inorganic arc-resistant fillers.

Filler Selection Principle

Minimize Organic Fillers: Organic fillers (e.g., refined cotton, short cotton lint) are prone to carbonization under arc action, forming conductive bridges that sharply reduce arc resistance. The experimental data show that when refined cotton content exceeds 8%, the arc resistance time drops below 100 seconds.

Prioritize Inorganic Arc-Resistant Fillers: Select inorganic fillers with good arc resistance and thermal conductivity, such as asbestos, talc, silica, and aluminum silicate fiber. Their effects are as follows:

Asbestos & Talcum Powder: Excellent arc resistance, forming a protective layer on the material surface under arc action to delay carbonization.
Silica Powder: High thermal conductivity, dissipating heat generated by arcs quickly to reduce local overheating and carbonization.
Aluminum Silicate Fiber: Improves mechanical strength while enhancing arc resistance, and can partially replace asbestos for more environmentally friendly formulations.

Mechanisms of Inorganic Fillers Improving Arc Resistance

Volume Effect: Fine inorganic filler particles divide and surround the resin and organic phases, preventing the formation of continuous carbonized conductive paths and significantly delaying short-circuiting.

Thermal Effect: Thermally conductive inorganic fillers (e.g., silica powder) dissipate arc-generated heat rapidly, reducing the material’s surface temperature and slowing the carbonization rate of organic components.

Experimental Formula Results

The table below shows the arc resistance performance of different formulations, clearly demonstrating the impact of filler ratios:

Formula No.	Resin Content (%)	Organic Filler (Refined Cotton) (%)	Inorganic Filler (Asbestos/Silica/Talcum) (%)	Arc Resistance Time (s)
1	55	7	35 (asbestos + talcum)	>180
2	55	9	35 (asbestos + talcum)	>180
3	56	8	35 (asbestos + silica + stone powder)	>180
4	56	5	38 (asbestos + silica + aluminum silicate fiber)	>180
5	56	6	33 (asbestos + talcum)	85
6	58	10	31 (asbestos)	46
7	59	11	29 (asbestos)	21

Formulas 1–4 achieve arc resistance times of over 180 seconds due to their low organic filler content and high proportion of composite inorganic fillers. Formulas 5–7 have higher resin and organic filler contents, resulting in poor arc resistance.

Volatile Content Control: Eliminate Internal Void Discharge

High volatile content in MF molding compounds is an important factor that reduces arc resistance. Volatiles (e.g., residual water, unreacted formaldehyde) escape during molding, leaving internal voids. Under high voltage, these voids generate partial discharge, accelerating material carbonization and degradation.

Preheating Treatment to Reduce Volatiles

Optimal Preheating Conditions: Heat the molding powder at 100–120℃ for 6–10 minutes before molding.
Effect: This treatment reduces volatile content to ≤1.5%, effectively eliminating internal voids and avoiding partial discharge. Test data shows that preheating can increase arc resistance time from 25–52 seconds to 123–213 seconds.

Process Control During Production

Extend Kneading Dehydration Time: Vacuum-dry the material during the kneading stage to reduce initial volatile content.
Control Molding Temperature & Pressure: Use stepwise heating and pressure holding during molding to allow volatiles to escape gradually, avoiding rapid gas expansion and void formation.

Practical Application Guidelines

To produce MF molding compounds with excellent arc resistance, follow these three key steps:

Resin Synthesis: Adjust the melamine-to-formaldehyde molar ratio based on the melamine source, add sodium hydroxide promptly during the reaction to promote methylene bond formation, and avoid excessive formaldehyde.
Formula Optimization: Reduce organic filler content to ≤8%, use composite inorganic fillers (asbestos + silica powder + talcum powder) to account for ≥35% of the formula, and balance arc resistance and mechanical strength.
Volatile Control: Preheat the molding powder at 100–120℃ for 6–10 minutes, ensuring volatile content ≤1.5% before molding.

conclusion

The arc resistance of MF molding compounds is jointly determined by the resin crosslinking structure, filler formulation, and volatile content. By controlling the melamine-to-formaldehyde molar ratio during resin synthesis, optimizing the filler system (reducing organic fillers, adding inorganic arc-resistant fillers), and limiting volatile content to ≤1.5% via preheating, the arc resistance time can be increased to over 180 seconds, meeting the requirements of high-voltage electrical components.

This research provides a clear technical path for the production of high-arc-resistance MF molding compounds, promoting their wider application in the electrical and instrumentation industries.

Tech Blog

Arc Resistance of Melamine Molding Compounds

Importance of Arc Resistance of Melamine Molding Compounds