jinjiang melamine

Tech Blog

Melamine Toxicity and Detection Methods

Melamine powder, a nitrogen-containing heterocyclic compound, is widely used in industrial production but poses severe health risks when illegally added to feed, milk, and dairy products. The 2008 Chinese milk scandal and 2007 U.S. pet “poisonous food incident” highlighted the urgency of strict monitoring. This article details melamine’s toxic mechanisms, the reasons for its illegal addition, and detection methods, and provides research progress for food safety inspectors, laboratory technicians, and public health professionals.

Basic Properties of Melamine

Melamine powder (chemical formula:‌C3H6N6, molecular weight: 126.12) is a white monoclinic crystal with distinct physical and chemical characteristics:

  • Physical Traits: Odorless, non-irritating, density 1.573 g/cm³ (14℃), melting point 354℃. It decomposes at high temperatures to produce toxic cyanide.
  • Solubility: Slightly soluble in water and alcohols, soluble in formaldehyde and acetic acid, insoluble in ether, benzene, and carbon tetrachloride. Reacts with acids (hydrochloric, sulfuric, nitric) to form salts.
  • Industrial Applications: Used in plastics, coatings, textiles, paper, and electrical materials due to its good mechanical strength, insulation, and stability.

is melamine toxic?

Melamine powder itself has low acute toxicity, but long-term or excessive intake causes serious health damage, with varying sensitivity among populations:

Core Toxic Pathway

  • Melamine powder is poorly metabolized and slowly excreted, leading to easy accumulation.
  • It hydrolyzes to cyanuric acid in the human/animal body. The two substances form insoluble macromolecular complexes in the kidneys and bladder, depositing as stones that block renal tubules, leading to hydronephrosis and even renal failure.
  • Chronic intake may induce bladder epithelial hyperplasia and bladder cancer due to long-term irritation from stones.

Population/Animal Susceptibility

  • Infants/Young Children: Immature kidney and bladder function make them more prone to severe kidney stones.
  • Adults: Lower sensitivity than infants, but long-term intake still causes urinary system damage, with a dose-effect relationship between intake and stone incidence.
  • Animals: Adult rats are more toxic than weaned rats; pets (e.g., cats, dogs) are highly susceptible, with massive deaths reported in the 2007 U.S. pet food incident.

Reasons for Illegal Addition of Melamine to Animal Products

The root cause of melamine contamination in milk, dairy products, and feed is economic fraud driven by flawed detection methods:

High Nitrogen Content Misleads Protein Detection

  • Melamine’s nitrogen content is ~66%, far higher than that of proteins (~16%).
  • The widely used Kjeldahl method for protein detection only measures total nitrogen content, multiplying by a conversion factor (6.25) to calculate protein content. It cannot distinguish between nitrogen from proteins and melamine.

Economic Incentives for Illegal Addition

Adding 0.01% melamine per kilogram of milk can falsely increase the detected protein content by 0.4%, helping illegal manufacturers meet quality standards (e.g., previous national standard requiring milk protein ≥2.95 g/100 g) and obtain higher purchase prices.

Physical State Facilitates Concealment

  • Melamine is added to milk as a powder, existing in a “suspended” rather than dissolved state.
  • Milk’s opaque, colloidal nature hides the suspended melamine, making it difficult to detect visually. The maximum suspension concentration in fresh milk is 32 mg/kg; excess will precipitate over time.

Current Detection Methods for Melamine

Qualitative Detection Methods (Rapid On-Site Screening)

Gravimetric Methods (Picric Acid Method & Sublimation Method)
Principle:Picric Acid Method: Melamine reacts with picric acid to form insoluble precipitates; the content is estimated by weighing the precipitate.

Sublimation Method: Melamine sublimes under vacuum and heating; the content is calculated by the mass difference before and after sublimation.

Potentiometric Titration

Principle: Titrate the melamine solution with standard sulfuric acid; calculate the concentration based on the volume of sulfuric acid consumed when the pH drops from 5 to 3.
Advantage: Simpler than gravimetric methods, suitable for rapid qualitative screening in laboratories.

ELISA Kit Method

Principle: Use antigen-antibody specific binding. Sample-extracted melamine competes with HRP enzyme-labeled melamine for antibody binding; the concentration is determined by measuring absorbance.
Advantages: Fast (results in ~1 hour), simple operation, no need for complex instruments—ideal for on-site qualitative detection by grassroots supervision agencies.

Quantitative Detection Methods (Laboratory Accurate Analysis)

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)

Principle: Simple sample pretreatment (extraction + purification), quantitative analysis via external standard method.
Performance: Quantitative limit of 2 mg/kg, low cost, and wide application in dairy product testing laboratories.

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS/GC-MS/MS)

Principle: Combines gas chromatography separation and mass spectrometry detection for high specificity and sensitivity.
Performance: GC-MS quantitative limit is 0.05 mg/kg; GC-MS/MS quantitative limit is 0.005 mg/kg—suitable for trace melamine detection.

Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)

Principle: No derivatization required, simple pretreatment, high accuracy, and sensitivity.
Performance: Quantitative limit of 0.01 mg/kg, recognized as a benchmark method for trace melamine detection in food safety supervision.

National Standard Detection Methods (GB/T 22388-2008)

HPLC
2 mg/kg
Routine detection of most samples
GC-MS
0.05 mg/kg
Trace detection requirements
LC-MS/MS
0.01 mg/kg
Ultra-trace detection and confirmation

Research Progress & Future Trends of Melamine Detection

Current Limitations

On-site detection methods (e.g., ELISA) have low sensitivity and cannot provide quantitative data.

Laboratory quantitative methods (e.g., LC-MS/MS) require expensive equipment and professional operators, making them inaccessible to grassroots agencies.

Complex matrices in feed and animal products (e.g., proteins and fats) can interfere with detection accuracy.

Future Development Directions

Portable On-Site Detection: Develop handheld, easy-to-operate qualitative devices for rapid screening by grassroots supervisors and the public.

Cost-Effective Quantitative Technology: Optimize existing methods to reduce equipment and reagent costs, enabling widespread use in small and medium-sized laboratories.

Dual Integration: Combine on-site qualitative screening (rapid preliminary judgment) and laboratory quantitative confirmation (accurate result determination) to improve supervision efficiency.

High-Sensitivity Miniaturization: Develop microfluidic chips or biosensors for ultra-trace, rapid detection with lower sample consumption.

conclusion-Melamine Toxicity and Detection Methods

Melamine’s illegal addition to animal products poses severe threats to public health, with toxicity mainly targeting the urinary system. Current detection systems rely on complementary qualitative and quantitative methods, but there is an urgent need for more portable, cost-effective technologies.

For food safety supervision, combining on-site rapid screening with accurate laboratory confirmation can improve efficiency. For researchers, developing high-sensitivity, easy-to-use detection tools is the key direction. By strengthening technical research and strict supervision, we can block illegal melamine addition and protect the safety of feed and animal products.

Related Blogs

Jinjiang chemical

Contact Us to Start Your Business